Navy & Marine-Option NROTC Performance Review Board Lawyer
In Navy ROTC, the Performance Review Board (PRB) and the disenrollment board are one and the same proceeding. A PRB recommendation of disenrollment goes directly to the commanding officer and then to NSTC — with no second hearing. Korody Law — including CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow, JAGC, USN — attends the PRB in person, argues directly to the board, and provides the aggressive advocacy that protects Navy and Marine-Option midshipmen from disenrollment, scholarship loss, and the end of their commissioning pathway. Marine-Option midshipmen are NROTC midshipmen. The same PRB process, the same NSTC chain, the same defense strategy — with additional Marine Corps-specific standards that require specific expertise to address.
In Navy ROTC, the PRB is the disenrollment hearing — there is no separate proceeding. A negative recommendation from the PRB goes directly to the commanding officer and then to NSTC for final action. There is no second chance to present your case at a different board. Contact Korody Law immediately so we can begin building your defense before the hearing date.
On This Page
- What Is an NROTC Performance Review Board?
- The PRB Is the Disenrollment Board — No Second Hearing
- Marine Option Is NROTC — Same Board, Same Process
- What Triggers a PRB
- How the PRB Process Works — Step by Step
- Possible PRB Outcomes and Consequences
- Scholarship Repayment — The Financial Stakes
- How Korody Law Defends Midshipmen at PRBs
- Attorney Profile — CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow, JAGC, USN
- NSTC Appeals — After an Adverse PRB Recommendation
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Related Practice Areas
What Is an NROTC Performance Review Board?
A Navy ROTC Performance Review Board (PRB) is a formal administrative board convened by the Naval ROTC unit's Professor of Naval Science (PNS) — the commanding officer of the unit — to evaluate a midshipman's performance, conduct, fitness, and suitability for continued enrollment in the NROTC program and ultimate commissioning as a Navy or Marine Corps officer.
The PRB is not an informal counseling session. It is not a disciplinary conference. It is a formal board proceeding with written notices, an official record, and outcomes that directly affect the midshipman's continuation in the program and their future military career. The board members — typically NROTC staff officers — evaluate the midshipman's record and make a written recommendation that the commanding officer reviews and forwards through the chain to the Naval Service Training Command (NSTC) for final action.
Understanding what a PRB is — and what it is not — is the starting point for understanding why the stakes are so high and why the defense at this hearing is so important.
The PRB Is the Disenrollment Board — There Is No Second Hearing
This is the single most important fact every Navy and Marine-Option midshipman facing a PRB must understand: in Navy ROTC, the Performance Review Board and the disenrollment board are the same proceeding. There is no separate disenrollment hearing. The PRB is the one formal opportunity for the midshipman to present their case to a board before the commanding officer makes a decision and forwards the matter to NSTC.
Unlike some administrative proceedings in the military where an unfavorable initial determination leads to another hearing at a higher level, the NROTC PRB is the only hearing. A negative PRB recommendation goes to the PNS, then to NSTC — and the next opportunity to present a case is on appeal to NSTC after the adverse decision is already in place. By that point, the record is set and the burden has shifted to the midshipman to demonstrate why the initial recommendation was wrong.
What the PRB Can Recommend
- Continuation — in the program without restriction
- Continuation with conditions — on probation or remediation plan with defined benchmarks and review timeline
- Probation — with specific conditions that must be met to avoid further action
- Leave of absence — administrative or medical, with a return pathway defined or not defined
- Scholarship suspension — removal of scholarship without full program disenrollment
- Disenrollment — removal from the NROTC program, with scholarship recoupment and loss of commissioning eligibility through NROTC
What Happens After the PRB
The PRB makes a written recommendation. The Professor of Naval Science (PNS) — the commanding officer — reviews the recommendation and makes their own determination. That determination is then forwarded to the Naval Service Training Command (NSTC) in Pensacola, Florida, which issues the final action. NSTC can approve, modify, or disapprove the PNS recommendation — but by the time the matter reaches NSTC, the hearing record is already established. What was presented at the PRB is what NSTC reviews.
Why the PRB Defense Is Everything
Because the PRB is the only hearing before the final decision is made, the defense presented at the PRB determines the quality of the record that goes up to NSTC. A well-prepared, well-argued PRB defense creates a record that supports favorable PNS action and, if necessary, gives the strongest possible foundation for a NSTC appeal. A poorly prepared PRB defense — or no defense at all — leaves the board with only the unit's account of the situation. That account is never the full picture.
"Every PRB must be treated like a disenrollment hearing — because it is one." This is the principle that guides our representation in every NROTC case.
Marine Option Is NROTC — Same Board, Same Process, Additional Standards
Marine-Option midshipmen are enrolled in NROTC. They are NROTC midshipmen pursuing a Marine Corps commission. They are governed by the same NSTC instructions, subject to the same PRB process, and appeal through the same chain as Navy-Option midshipmen — with additional Marine Corps-specific fitness and conduct standards layered on top.
This distinction matters for how defense strategy is built. Some attorneys who handle NROTC cases are unfamiliar with the Marine-specific standards that apply to Marine-Option midshipmen and fail to address them adequately at the PRB. Others treat Marine-Option as an entirely separate program from NROTC and miss the procedural framework that actually governs the proceeding. Both errors are preventable with the right counsel.
The correct framework is this: Marine-Option midshipmen participate in the NROTC program at a host university under the authority of the PNS (a Navy captain). The PRB that evaluates a Marine-Option midshipman is an NROTC PRB — convened under NSTC instructions, governed by NSTC regulations, and appealed through NSTC. The Marine Corps does not run a separate ROTC program. What makes Marine Option distinct are the additional fitness standards, the Marine Corps training and evaluation events, and the Marine officer accession pipeline requirements that apply to Marine-Option midshipmen in addition to NROTC program requirements.
What Marine Option Shares With Navy Option
- Enrollment in the NROTC program at the same host university under the same PNS commanding officer
- Subject to the same NSTC instructions governing the NROTC program overall
- The same PRB process and procedure — same convening authority, same board composition structure, same written recommendation pathway
- The same PNS determination and NSTC review chain after the PRB
- The same appeal rights and NSTC appellate process
- The same scholarship structure and recoupment exposure upon disenrollment
- The same right to legal representation at the PRB
What Is Unique to Marine Option
- Marine Corps PFT and CFT standards replace the Navy PRT as the fitness evaluation — higher physical demands, different test events, and Marine Corps body composition standards
- Marine Corps summer training events — including Officer Candidate School (OCS) evaluations and Marine Corps training exercises that provide additional evaluation data beyond what the NROTC unit sees
- Marine Corps tactical training assessments — drill, field skills, weapons handling, and military bearing evaluations that are part of the Marine officer pathway and not required for Navy-Option midshipmen
- Marine Corps officer accession standards — Marine Corps Recruiting Command maintains separate eligibility standards for Marine commissioning that apply to Marine-Option midshipmen and are evaluated in parallel with NROTC standing
- Higher conduct threshold — conduct issues that might result in probation for a Navy-Option midshipman may be treated more seriously for Marine-Option midshipmen given the Marine Corps' officer accession posture
Korody Law's CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow served in the Navy JAG Corps for decades, working alongside and within the same command structures that govern both Navy and Marine-Option NROTC programs. He understands the Marine Corps officer standards and culture as well as the Navy program, and he knows how Marine-Option PRB boards evaluate fitness, conduct, and leadership concerns through a Marine officer lens. That familiarity is not something every attorney can offer.
What Triggers an NROTC PRB
A PRB can be convened for a wide range of reasons — academic, physical, conduct-related, or leadership-related. Understanding the specific basis for the PRB in your case is the first step in building the strongest possible defense.
Academic Deficiencies
- Overall GPA falling below minimum program standards (typically 2.0 cumulative or semester)
- Failure of a required naval science course
- Repeated academic probation without demonstrated trajectory of improvement
- Academic misconduct — honor code violations at the university level that affect NROTC standing
- Failure to maintain full-time student status
- Grade deficiencies in major-specific courses required for commissioning eligibility
Physical Fitness Failures
- Navy-Option: PRT (Physical Readiness Test) failures at the failing level after the remediation period
- Marine-Option: PFT (Physical Fitness Test) or CFT (Combat Fitness Test) failures, or body composition failures under Marine Corps standards
- Repeated fitness failures in consecutive testing cycles demonstrating lack of improvement
- Failure to complete required physical conditioning program during remediation
- Fitness failures arising from injury — where medical documentation and an appropriate remediation timeline can sometimes support a different outcome than straight fitness-based disenrollment
Conduct & Disciplinary Issues
- Alcohol-related incidents — DUI, underage possession, alcohol-related conduct violations at or off campus
- Drug-related incidents — positive drug test, drug-related arrest, or drug use disclosure
- Sexual misconduct allegations — Title IX complaints, SHARP investigations, or criminal referrals
- Insubordination, unauthorized absence from required NROTC events, or failure to follow orders from NROTC staff
- Social media conduct that reflects poorly on officer standards or that involves posting prohibited content
- Off-campus civilian criminal arrest or conviction
- Academic dishonesty (cheating, plagiarism) investigated through university honor processes
Leadership & Officer Potential Concerns
- Repeated or pattern counseling for the same behavioral concern without documented improvement
- Poor midshipman performance evaluations from NROTC staff officers
- Negative assessments from summer training programs — Navy Midshipman cruise, Officer Development School, or Marine Corps Officer Candidate School performance concerns
- Negative peer evaluations within the battalion
- Concerns about maturity, decision-making, or professional bearing raised by multiple staff members
- Drill, field skills, or tactical training failures in Marine-Option midshipmen
Medical & Administrative Issues
- Medical conditions identified during program participation that affect commissioning eligibility
- Mental health conditions identified during the program — including anxiety, depression, or adjustment disorders — that may require medical evaluation and waiver processes
- Failure to obtain required medical clearances for summer training or other program requirements
- Change in academic standing at the host institution affecting NROTC program eligibility
- Failure to complete required NROTC documentation, evaluations, or reporting requirements within specified deadlines
Repeated Counseling Without Improvement
- A pattern of documented counseling entries for the same concern across multiple semesters — even if no single incident rises to the level of a stand-alone PRB trigger — can cumulatively support a PRB convening
- Counseling records are formal documents that become part of the PRB record — they should be reviewed carefully by defense counsel before the hearing for accuracy, completeness, and fairness
- Many PRBs are triggered not by a single dramatic event but by a pattern the staff characterizes as demonstrating inadequate officer potential — the most subjective and most defensible type of PRB basis
How the PRB Process Works — Step by Step
Understanding each stage of the PRB process — and where the defense can intervene at each step — is essential to protecting the midshipman's interests from the moment of notification forward.
-
Notification of PRB Convening
The midshipman receives written notification that a PRB will be convened, specifying the basis for the board. This notification must include the specific grounds and must be provided with adequate time for the midshipman to prepare. Review the notification carefully — the grounds stated in the notification define the scope of the board proceeding. Any grounds not properly noticed may be challengeable. Contact Korody Law the same day you receive the notification. The time between notification and the hearing date is the most critical preparation window.
-
Records Review and Defense Evidence Development
Before any response is prepared, we obtain and review the complete NROTC record — performance evaluations, counseling entries, fitness test results, academic transcripts, and any incident or investigation documentation the unit is relying on. We identify errors, unfair characterizations, and procedural issues in the existing record that can be challenged or contextualized at the hearing. We then begin building the defense evidence package: character letters, academic improvement documentation, fitness remediation records, medical documentation, and witness identification.
-
Written Matters Submission
Before the board hearing, the midshipman typically has the opportunity to submit written matters in their own behalf — a package of documents supporting their case for continuation. We prepare this package strategically: it is not simply a collection of documents, but a carefully constructed narrative that addresses the specific PRB basis, demonstrates concrete improvement, and frames the midshipman's record in the most favorable light. The written submission becomes part of the official PRB record and is reviewed by both the board and NSTC.
-
PRB Hearing — Attorney Appears and Argues
Our attorneys appear at the PRB in person — or via video when in-person attendance is not feasible — to argue directly to the board. This includes presenting the defense evidence, contextualizing the midshipman's record, addressing the specific concerns raised in the notification, calling witnesses where permitted, and cross-examining adverse witnesses. The board members are NROTC staff officers evaluating a fellow would-be officer. An experienced retired Navy JAG Captain arguing the case for the midshipman changes the dynamic of that room — and it produces better outcomes than a written package alone.
-
PNS Determination and NSTC Review
After the PRB, the Professor of Naval Science reviews the board's recommendation and makes their own written determination — agreeing, modifying, or disagreeing with the board. That determination is forwarded to NSTC (Naval Service Training Command) in Pensacola, Florida, which issues the final action on behalf of the Chief of Naval Education and Training (CNET). The full PRB record — including everything the defense presented at the hearing — accompanies the PNS determination to NSTC. What the defense built at the hearing is what NSTC reviews.
-
NSTC Appeal — If the Decision Is Adverse
If the NSTC action is adverse — upholding a disenrollment recommendation — the midshipman has the right to submit an appeal to NSTC presenting arguments for reversal or modification. NSTC appeals must be based on the record developed at the PRB, supplemented by any new evidence not previously available. A strong PRB record is the foundation for an effective NSTC appeal — another reason why building the PRB defense aggressively from the start is the right approach regardless of the initial outcome.
Possible PRB Outcomes and Their Full Consequences
The PRB board can recommend — and NSTC can ultimately impose — a range of outcomes. Understanding what each outcome means in practice is essential to appreciating what is at stake.
Favorable Outcomes
- Continuation without conditions: The midshipman remains in the program in good standing. The PRB matter is closed, though the record of the PRB convening typically remains in the unit's files.
- Continuation with conditions (probation): The midshipman continues in the program subject to specified conditions — academic benchmarks, fitness standards, behavioral expectations — with a defined review timeline. Successful completion of the conditions closes the matter; failure triggers further action.
- Leave of absence — medical: Where the PRB basis involves a medical issue, a medical leave of absence preserves the commissioning pathway while the medical issue is addressed, with a defined return process that avoids disenrollment and — critically — typically avoids scholarship recoupment.
- Scholarship suspension without disenrollment: In limited circumstances, the board may recommend suspension of scholarship benefits without full program disenrollment — a less severe outcome that preserves the commissioning pathway while addressing the concern.
Adverse Outcomes and Their Full Impact
- Disenrollment: Removal from the NROTC program. Loss of commissioning eligibility through NROTC. Triggers scholarship recoupment review. The record of disenrollment affects future commissioning applications through OCS/OTS and other alternative pathways.
- Scholarship recoupment: Where disenrollment is based on the midshipman's misconduct or failure to meet program standards — rather than medical reasons or factors beyond their control — the government typically seeks repayment of all scholarship funds received. For students who have received multiple years of scholarship support at a private institution, this obligation can exceed $60,000–$100,000.
- Enlisted obligation: In rare cases permitted under some scholarship contracts, the government may require the disenrolled midshipman to fulfill their service obligation as an enlisted member rather than repaying scholarship funds. Whether this option is available and on what terms depends on the specific contract, the basis for disenrollment, and the branch's current policy posture.
How the disenrollment is characterized matters financially. Whether NSTC characterizes the disenrollment as conduct-based or as medical/administrative-based determines whether scholarship recoupment is sought. Fighting to frame the basis of any disenrollment in the most favorable terms — even when some adverse action cannot be avoided — is a critical defense objective with direct financial consequences.
Scholarship Repayment — The Financial Stakes No One Talks About
NROTC scholarships cover tuition, room and board, and a monthly stipend — often valued between $40,000 and $180,000 or more over four years depending on the institution. When a midshipman accepts a scholarship, they sign a contract committing to military service in exchange for those benefits. Disenrollment from the program can trigger a government demand for repayment of every dollar of scholarship already received.
This is the financial consequence that most families do not fully understand until they are facing it. A midshipman who is disenrolled as a junior or senior — after receiving two or three years of scholarship support — may face a six-figure repayment obligation in addition to losing their commission and their program. Managing this financial dimension is part of every NROTC disenrollment defense we handle.
What Triggers Repayment
- Disenrollment due to conduct, misconduct, or academic failure that the midshipman could have controlled
- Voluntary disenrollment — choosing to leave the program without a qualifying reason
- Academic failure that the government characterizes as a failure of diligence rather than circumstance
- Fitness failures that are not supported by medical documentation or documented effort at improvement
What Can Reduce or Eliminate Repayment
- Medical disenrollment — disenrollment for medical conditions beyond the midshipman's control typically does not trigger recoupment
- Administrative disenrollment — when the basis is institutional or programmatic rather than the midshipman's fault
- Favorable characterization of the disenrollment basis by the board — even in mixed cases, the characterization matters
- Fulfillment of service obligation through enlisted service instead of repayment — where available under the scholarship contract
Defense Strategy for the Repayment Dimension
We address scholarship repayment as a parallel defense objective in every NROTC case — not as an afterthought if the commissioning defense fails. The specific arguments we make at the PRB — particularly those framing any conduct or performance issue in its full context, demonstrating genuine effort at improvement, and presenting any medical or situational factors that contributed to the issue — directly affect how NSTC characterizes the basis for disenrollment and therefore whether recoupment is sought.
In cases where some adverse action is unavoidable, we fight hard for the characterization that minimizes or eliminates the financial consequence. A midshipman who loses their scholarship but avoids a six-figure repayment demand is in a fundamentally different position than one who faces both. That distinction — and the advocacy that produces it — requires specifically understanding how the repayment determination is made and how it connects to the PRB's findings.
How Korody Law Defends Midshipmen at PRBs
Our representation is hands-on, personal, and aggressive. We do not submit written packages and wish the midshipman luck. We appear at the PRB, argue to the board, and give the midshipman the best possible chance of walking out of that room with their commission intact. Here is what that looks like in practice.
What We Do Before the PRB
- Full record review: Every performance evaluation, counseling entry, fitness test record, academic transcript, and incident report in the NROTC file — reviewed in detail for errors, unfair characterizations, and procedural issues that can be challenged or corrected
- Notification analysis: Verification that the PRB was properly noticed with adequate time and specific grounds — any defect in the notification process is raised as an affirmative challenge
- Defense evidence development: Character letters from commanding officers, professors, coaches, mentors, and peers; academic improvement documentation; fitness remediation records; medical documentation; unit performance data that provides context for the concerns raised
- Witness preparation: Identification and preparation of character witnesses and witnesses with specific knowledge of the facts at issue
- Written matters package: A strategically crafted pre-hearing submission that addresses the PRB basis directly, presents the defense evidence, and frames the narrative the board will carry into the hearing
- Midshipman preparation: Thorough preparation of the midshipman for their own statement — what to say, how to say it, and how to handle questions from board members effectively and confidently
What We Do At the PRB
- In-person appearance: Our attorney attends the PRB in person at the NROTC unit — traveling wherever the hearing is held across the country. A retired Navy JAG Captain appearing at the board changes the proceeding.
- Direct advocacy to the board: We open with argument framing the defense narrative, present evidence, and close with the strongest possible case for the outcome we are seeking — continuation, probation over disenrollment, or the most favorable characterization of any adverse outcome
- Witness examination: Where permitted by the board's procedures, we examine supporting witnesses and — critically — challenge any adverse witnesses or evidence through cross-examination or pointed inquiry
- Real-time advising: We advise the midshipman throughout the hearing — preparing them for board member questions and ensuring they present themselves in the strongest possible light
- Record creation: Ensuring that the full defense case is entered into the PRB record that goes up to NSTC — both for the PNS determination and for any subsequent appeal
What We Do After the PRB
- Analysis of the board's findings and recommendation relative to the defense presented
- Advising on PNS interaction and any supplemental submissions before the NSTC referral
- If NSTC action is adverse — immediate evaluation and development of the NSTC appeal
Attorney Profile — CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow, JAGC, USN
CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow, JAGC, USN
CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow is a retired Navy Captain (O-6) in the Judge Advocate General's Corps — one of the most senior ranks in the Navy's legal community. During his active-duty career, CAPT Crow served as a senior Navy JAG officer advising commanding officers on military law, officer evaluation, administrative proceedings, and personnel actions across the full spectrum of Navy and Marine Corps administrative law.
That experience gives CAPT Crow a perspective that no junior attorney or civilian advocate can match in NROTC proceedings. The officers on a PRB board are evaluating a midshipman's fitness for a commission — and they are doing so through their own lens as Navy or Marine Corps officers. CAPT Crow speaks that language. He has spent decades in the same institutional culture that PRB board members inhabit. He understands what genuine officer potential looks like, what authentic rehabilitation means to a military evaluation board, and how to present a defense that resonates with the officers making the decision.
CAPT Crow has defended Navy and Marine-Option midshipmen at PRBs across the country — traveling to university campuses from coast to coast to appear in person. His presence at a PRB — a retired Navy Captain arguing directly to NROTC staff officers on behalf of the midshipman — commands attention and credibility that no remote submission or junior advocate can replicate.
Why an O-6 Changes the Dynamic
PRB board members are typically junior to mid-grade officers. A retired O-6 — a Captain who outranked every officer at virtually every NROTC unit in the country — carries institutional authority that changes how the board approaches the hearing. Arguments made by CAPT Crow are heard differently than arguments made by a civilian attorney with no military experience. That dynamic matters for outcomes.
NSTC Appeal Wins
CAPT Crow has achieved NSTC appeal reversals in cases where initial PRB recommendations were adverse. These reversals — reversals of disenrollment recommendations at the NSTC level — require both a strong initial PRB record and a focused, well-argued appeal to NSTC that identifies specific grounds for reversal. Not every adverse initial decision is final.
Nationwide Travel
CAPT Crow travels to every NROTC unit in the country to appear in person at PRBs. From large flagship universities to small regional campuses, from the East Coast to the West Coast — wherever the PRB is held, we are there in person. Distance is not an obstacle to representation by the most experienced NROTC defense attorney in the country.
NSTC Appeals — After an Adverse PRB Recommendation
If the PRB recommends disenrollment and the PNS agrees, the matter goes to NSTC for final action. NSTC has the authority to approve, modify, or disapprove the PNS recommendation — and if NSTC takes adverse action, the midshipman has the right to submit an appeal for NSTC reconsideration. CAPT Crow has successfully obtained NSTC reversals in cases where initial PRB recommendations were adverse.
Grounds for NSTC Appeal
- Procedural error: Failure to provide proper notification, inadequate opportunity to present defense evidence, improper board composition, or failure to follow applicable NSTC instructions in the conduct of the PRB
- Factual error: The PRB's findings are not supported by the evidence in the record, or significant favorable evidence was ignored or given inadequate weight
- Legal error: The applicable regulation does not support disenrollment on the specific facts found, or the board applied the wrong standard in evaluating the conduct at issue
- New evidence: Evidence that became available after the PRB that materially changes the factual picture — improved fitness scores, academic improvement, completion of counseling, new medical information
- Disproportion: Where disenrollment is technically supportable but the consequence is disproportionate to the conduct — particularly for first-offense or isolated incidents in an otherwise strong record — a compelling proportionality argument can sometimes produce a modification to probation rather than disenrollment
Why the PRB Record Determines the Appeal
The NSTC appeal is evaluated based primarily on the PRB record — the documents, testimony, and arguments that were presented at the hearing. Evidence that was not presented at the PRB generally cannot be introduced for the first time on appeal (with limited exceptions for genuinely new evidence that could not have been obtained before the hearing).
This is the most important reason to build the PRB defense comprehensively from the start: every piece of favorable evidence, every character letter, every medical record, every academic improvement document, and every legal argument must be in the PRB record. An NSTC appeal built on a strong PRB record is a genuine opportunity for reversal. An NSTC appeal built on an empty PRB record is an appeal that starts from almost nothing.
We prepare every PRB defense with the appeal already in mind — creating a record that supports the best possible outcome at the hearing level and provides the strongest possible foundation for appeal if the initial outcome is adverse.
One Hearing. Your Commission. Don't Face It Alone.
The PRB is the only hearing before the disenrollment decision is made. Every Navy and Marine-Option midshipman deserves aggressive, experienced representation at that hearing. Contact Korody Law today for a free consultation with CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow's team.
Frequently Asked Questions
-
Yes. Marine-Option is a track within the NROTC program — not a separate program. Marine-Option midshipmen are enrolled in NROTC at the same host university under the same PNS commanding officer, governed by the same NSTC instructions, and subject to the same PRB process and NSTC appellate chain as Navy-Option midshipmen. The distinction is the commissioning destination and the additional Marine Corps-specific fitness, training, and conduct standards that apply to Marine-Option midshipmen — not the administrative framework governing the program. This means that the PRB defending a Marine-Option midshipman is an NROTC PRB, governed by NROTC regulations, and the defense strategy is fundamentally an NROTC defense strategy supplemented by expertise in Marine Corps officer standards.
-
Yes, in Navy ROTC. Unlike some other military administrative proceedings where separate boards handle performance review and disenrollment, the Navy ROTC Performance Review Board IS the disenrollment board — a single proceeding that can recommend either continuation or disenrollment. There is no separate disenrollment hearing. The PRB recommendation goes directly to the PNS and then to NSTC for final action. This means every PRB must be approached and defended with the full weight of a disenrollment proceeding — because that is exactly what it is.
-
Yes. You have the right to retain civilian legal counsel to represent and advise you at the PRB. NROTC regulations permit attorney participation in the PRB proceeding. While you do not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel (this is an administrative proceeding, not a criminal trial), you can retain a civilian attorney at your own expense. Korody Law — and specifically CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow — routinely appears at NROTC PRBs nationwide to argue directly to the board on behalf of midshipmen. Our presence at the hearing changes how the proceeding is conducted and produces better outcomes than a written submission alone.
-
Disenrollment based on conduct or failure to meet program standards typically triggers a government demand for repayment of all scholarship funds received — tuition, room and board, and stipend payments. For a midshipman who has received two or three years of scholarship support at a private institution, this can exceed $60,000–$100,000. Disenrollment for medical reasons or factors beyond the midshipman's control may result in waiver of the repayment obligation. The characterization of the basis for disenrollment in the PRB's findings and NSTC's action directly determines whether recoupment is sought — which is why fighting for the most favorable characterization, even in cases where some adverse action cannot be avoided, is a critical defense objective with direct financial consequences.
-
Yes — in many cases. A single PFT failure does not automatically result in disenrollment. The PRB evaluates the midshipman's overall trajectory — whether they are making genuine progress, whether there is a medical explanation for the failure, and whether the remediation effort demonstrates commitment to meeting Marine Corps standards. A defense that documents genuine fitness improvement, presents a credible remediation plan, addresses any medical factors, and demonstrates the midshipman's commitment to Marine Corps service can persuade a PRB to recommend probation with a fitness recovery timeline rather than disenrollment. We have helped Marine-Option midshipmen avoid disenrollment after PFT failures in cases that initially appeared uncertain.
-
Absolutely. Korody Law's NROTC PRB practice is genuinely national. CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow travels to the location of the PRB to appear in person — regardless of where your NROTC unit is located. We have appeared at universities from the East Coast to the West Coast and everywhere in between. Geographic distance is not an obstacle to effective representation. Contact us regardless of where your unit is located, and we will advise on the best approach to your specific case.
-
If the PRB has already issued an adverse recommendation, the focus shifts to the PNS determination and the NSTC appeal process. We evaluate the PRB record for procedural errors, factual errors, and legal arguments that support reversal or modification. We also assess whether any new evidence is available that was not presented at the hearing. CAPT Crow has successfully obtained NSTC reversals of adverse PRB recommendations, including disenrollment reversals on appeal. The strength of the appeal depends heavily on the quality of the PRB record — but if you are post-PRB with an adverse recommendation, contact us immediately. Time and deadlines matter in the appellate process.
Your Commission. Your Future. Defend Both.
Korody Law — including CAPT (Ret.) Robert Crow, JAGC, USN — has defended Navy and Marine-Option NROTC midshipmen at Performance Review Boards across the United States. We attend the hearing. We argue your case directly to the board. We protect your commission, your scholarship, and your future. Contact us today for a free and confidential consultation.
Korody Law, P.A. · Jacksonville, FL · Nationwide NROTC Performance Review Board Defense